Wednesday, 28 March 2018

2018 a better year for Comfortdelgro?





  • Government hint on rising fare
  • New rail asset light model to further increase bus segment's revenue
  • Downtown to generate profit
  • M&A in 2017 to contribute to full year profit
  • More M&A opportunities
  • Scrap LGR deal
  • Grab may concentrate on SEA business rather than fight CDG
  • Taxi vs PHV competition should normalize with Uber's exit

I did a conservative DCF with a -1.7% revenue for the next 5 years and 0 growth till perpetuity with a 12% discount rate. The fair value is $2.27.

Will CDG be so bad to have 0 growth and a shrinking top line?
Read More

Thursday, 22 March 2018

Duty Free International and its recent troubles



Duty Free International (DFI) operates duty-free retail outlets throughout Malaysia near border town, terminals, airports, seaport and tourist attraction. Other business includes a country club and oil palm plantation. In 2016, Heinemann Asia Pacific(HAP) bought a 15% (with options to add up to 25%) stake in DFI’s DFZ Capital Berhad (DFZ). DFZ the duty-free segment which is 97.8% of DFI’s revenue, which mean actually buying DFI itself. This path the way for Mr Andrea Curt Winnen and Mr Hendrik Korbinian Hedye to be the new CEO and Operation Director, bringing expertise from from Gebr. Heinemann, parent of Heinemann Asia Pacific.


Key milestones
  • 2013 – Divestment of business interested with connection with the Zon Johor Bahru (i.e, hotel, complex and ferry terminal business operation) on 15 March 2013, recorded in FY 2014
  • 2016 - HAP bought a 10% stake in DFZ.
  • 2016 - Open new stores at KL International Airport 2.
  • 2017- HAP add another 5% stake in DFZ.

Interesting Facts
  • Placement taken place in 2015 & 2016 priced at S$0.32, S$0.365, S$0.38
  • DFI together with HAP to explore opportunities within and outside Malaysia.
  • HAP to buy the the remainder 10% within the next 12 months
  • HAP bought 5% of DFZ at 9.58million Euro. 100% would worth at 197million Euro, equivalent to SGD 319.7mill. If we divide that by DFI outstanding shares. each DFZ is worth S$0.262 in terms of DFI shares. Hence, DFI is worth at least S$0.26. (base on 23/3/2018 Fx rates). 
  • HAP bought DFZ at S$1.52 per share vs S$1.19 recorded as cost. A 27.7% gain.
  • Expressed interest to dual list at HKEX since July 2015
  • Fx rates base on 23/3/2018.


Performance




Revenue growth is nothing to shout about at CAGR 2.65% however a higher bottom line growth show that DFI control its operating expenses well.Cash increase drastically due to share placements as well as sales of equity to HAP. DFI has been holding the cash for a year now, still do notknow what they will do with it. NAV continues to grow healthily and steadily, surprise that the placement did not dilute shareholder’s equity.
Yield

Although top line growth is not great, it is a good income stock giving good dividend. Payout  ratio range from 50% to 160%, will it be sustainable? For now, with the huge cash pile. Payout should not be a problem for a while. Average 5 year yield of 10.08%. Above yield is base on share price of S$0.24.

Trouble with Custom


I have no idea what are all those ‘Act’ but everyone should know about GST. After poking around the internet I found this in the Malaysia GST guide

As above, goods bought here is duty free, DFI has one store at Buki Kayu Hitam. Apply the same rule to the accused SMSB which is at Pengkalan Hulu, should be free of GST tax. 

As the custom point out that DFI did not comply to certain condtion. In the worst case scenario, DFI would have to pay the fine and rectify the issue. This will be a one off event. If so, I also doubt DFI will paid the full sum that the custom is asking. 40 million for 2 years, 20 million a year for one store (of 31 stores) is too ridiculous. DFI net profit is only 60 million.




Assumptions

Assuming Darul Metro Sdn Bhd has a value proportional to/gain as DFZ. Darul Metro Sdn Bhd would has a value of S$0.081 (230645/669304*0.262). This show DFI has a value no lesser than S$0.343. And I haven't include the golf and oil palm business.

Conclusion

DFI is a slow growing company that chuck out good earnings with average net margin of 10%. For now, it appears to be a good income play. HAP acquiring the remaining 10% of DFZ further boosting DFI's already big cash pile.

With HAP, maybe DFI can finally have better growth opportunity in the near future. I think should have a plan acquiring DFZ.

My DCF give a fair price of S$0.44 (with 10% Forex MOS), all things remain equal. Give a 20% MOS, a good buy will be below S$0.35. This value is similar to the estimated value base on the assumption above of S$0.343

However, DFI is not well known for having a high market price. So just hold for dividend until it fly one day. And also we are paying cheaper than HAP who bought at S$0.262 a share at current price.

The custom tax demand may not materialize due to the reason stated above and DFI is confident about the case. If custom does win in the end. Well, it's time for them to rewrite that GST guide.



Vested at 0.257. Has since divested, same reason for divesting UMS. Prefer a more stable income stock. Revenue wasn't as stable as initially though to be. I have an income & value/growth portfolio. Cash has dropped since with dividend payout and acquisition. Do take note of the cash holding as it will eventually affect the payout ratio.
Read More

Wednesday, 14 March 2018

Taking a look at StarhillGbl Reit


Positive

- almost 91% Singapore office occupancy rate with committed lease in 3Q (01/2018 to 03/2018) above market rate but below expiring rents.

- China property handed over to Markor International Home Furnishings Co. with  periodic step-up rent structure. Renovation to finished in 3Q. I assume no rent is collect yet as in FY 16/17, the property incur a loss.


- Assuming the  China property to have the same NPI as in FY15/16 of 2.6 million. It will contribute 0.12cents to DPU.

- Australia Plaza Arcade with its 41% expansion on AEI of 2000 sqm, of which 1200 is committed to anchor tenant UNIQLO's first Australia store. 

- If the AEI GLA if fully leased out and base on FY16/17 NPI from the property, NPI will increase by 0.96million (41% more GLA), which will contribute about 0.05cents to DPU.

- A total of 0.17cents upside to DPU a year or 0.042cents a quarter.


Negative

- Huge lease expiry next fiscal year 18/19. (SG properties)

- Plaza Arcade NPI for FY16/17 is 2.4 million which a 33% drop from FY15/16 although occupancy rate has risen from 74.5% to 94%(Ouch). 


- Can see that Plaza Arcade is doing very badly, property value is below purchase price.



Comparison

Only13% of StarhillGbl Reit's revenue are from offices, hence I will not compare it with Mapletree Commercial Trust nor Suntec Reit.


Price Base on 14/3/2018

StarhillGbl Reit
CapitaMall Trust
Fraser Centerpt Trust
2013
6.85%
4.08%
4.97%
2014
7%
5.22%
5.09%
2015
7.1%
5.48%
5.28%
2016
7.13%
5.48%
5.36%
2017
6.7%
5.48%
5.41%
PB Ratio
0.78
1.06
1.1
   

StarhillGbl Reit  perform badly for the FY16/17 while CapitaMall Trust is stagnant while Fraser Centerpt Trust continue to grow.
 
Base on StarhillGbl Reit 1H result, yield for 17/18, estimate to have a drop in 7.4% or 0.36 cents to 4.56 cents in DPU. Yield should decrease to below 6.4%.

Conclusion

A estimated 0.17cents increase in DPU from AEI and new tenants seem lackluster and would not cover the 0.36 cents drop.

Assuming I can buy CapitaMall Trust and Fraser Centerpt Trust at NAV, I can get a yield of 5.8% - 6%. Therefore, it would be worthwhile to collect StarhillGbl Reit when yield is > 6%. With the dropping DPU, will only consider adding with a MOS near 6.6% yield or less than 0.70.





Read More

Saturday, 10 March 2018

Ascendas Hospitality Trust


Ascendas Hospitality Trust caught my eyes for a long time as I like to own hotels in Japan to tap on Japan’s growing tourism. Especially so when they recently sold their 2 hotels in china.

Ascendas Hospitality Trust (AHT) is a hospitality Reit comprises of 11 9+1 hotels in Asia Pacific in Singapore, Australia, China and Japan. On November 2017, AHT announced an expansion of markets beyond Asia Pacific for potential investment. A quick look at the important metrics of AHT.


Ticker Code: Q1P
Sponsor: Ascendas-Singbridge Group. Jointly owned by Temasek and JTC.
NAV per share: 0.86 as at Dec 31 2017
Estimated NAV per share after china Divestment : 0.96 (Adjusted)
Gearing: 33.2%
Estimated gearing after repayment estimate to be: 23.6%
Price: 0.845 (09/03/2018)
PB after Divestment: 0.88







 Properties
Hotel Sunroute Osaka Namba
Australia
Japan
Singapore
China (DIVESTED)
Pullman Sydney Hyde Park
Hotel Sunroute Ariake and Oakwood Apartments Ariake Tokyo
Park Hotel Clarke Quay
Novotel Beijing Sanyuan
Novotel Sydney Central
Hotel Sunroute Osaka Namba

Ibis Beijing Sanyuan
Novotel Sydney Parramatta



Courtyard by Marriott Sydney-North Ryde



Pullman and Mercure Melbourne Albert Park



Pullman and Mercure Brisbane King George Square



Shama Luxe Aurora Melbourne Central
(2H 2019)




                                                                                   
AHT announced on Jan 29 2018, that they will be selling their 2 hotels in china at 178% profit! 1156 million RMB is about S$240 million. Proceeds will used to repay debts, distribution and acquisitions.
Divestment of China Properties
                     

Performance

NAV has been growing with a CAGR of 9%. Net property income and DPS has been growing steadily. Future acquisition with cash from the divestment and a new service apartment to be completed in 2H2019 provide a good growth story.




If you take a look at other hospitality Reits such as FHT, CDLHT, FEHT and OUEHT, their DPU is dropping for years and are trading at near or above NAV. Do note that OUEHT has been receiving income support till 2017, not sure about the others. AHT is the only one with growing DPU.

Price Base on 10/3/2018

AHT
CDLHT
FHT
FEHT
OUEHT
2013
7.53%
6.57%

8.83%

2014
6.3%
6.43%

7.38%
9.14%
2015
6.17%
6.21%
12.47%
6.59%
7.71%
2016
6.43%
5.85%
6.95%
6.13%
5.76%
2017
6.79%
5.74%
6.5%
5.66%
6.08%


DEBT                                        
 
Most debt is on fixed interest rate. Gearing will drop to 26.3% at an assumption of paying off S$160 million in debt.  Proceeds from  divestment should worth S$235.9 million, S$218.7 after fees. This give AHT headroom to take on more debt for future acquisitions. This leave us with S$58.7 million for a possible distribution of approximately special dividend of 0.05. However, most likely AHT will top up the shortfall of DPU from the absent of the China Properties.



Conclusion
At price to book of 0.88 after divestment on 31 March 2018, this Reit is fairly cheap in comparison of its performance against other hospitality Reits. Growth story of future acquisition from divestment proceed and its 9th property to be complete in 2H2019. Possible estimated special dividend of 0.05.

Vested at 0.869.

Read More
Powered by Blogger.